![]() ![]() Yes that is what I found with the AP on Queen Elizabeth, Warspite, Duke of York, and Hood is that despite so many saying to Spam HE, it’s actually the usage of AP that delivers the best results. Finally a reason for you to stop spamming HE in those ships once in a while. Since improved AP angles was one of the things she raved about on the initial version of the ship, perhaps being aware of this fact might have shifted her opinion of it to " Mehbote" rather than " Garbage".Īnyway, there you go. Neither on YouTube nor here on the forums who, based on her review of the ship, apparently believes the improved bounce angles and dispersion didn't carry over from her initial version. ![]() The same as Super Heavy shells on American high tier heavy cruisers.Įvery other BB in the game (except the Hood) has 45 and 60 degrees respectively.Īs far as I've seen, no reviewer is aware of this fact. Her AP bounce threshold is 60 degrees and autobounce is 67.5 degrees. vertical dispersion value and get improved bounce angles on her AP shells. The reason for the RoF nerf, compared to the KGV, is because the DoY guns have over 40% tighter min. So, h ere's something practically no one knows. However, I did notice a couple key differences between the KGV and the DoY during my own comparisons based on mined data (which I confirmed through of the main points of contention of DoY, when it came out, was that it sacrificed nearly 5 seconds of reload time for seemingly no reason at all. So I read a few reviews and watched a few videos and found out that there had been no buffs to it during the course of the last year, at all. I played 5 games in it and promptly sold it.įast forward to this week when, for one reason or another, I started thinking about it again and wanted to get her back. ![]() I too was one of those that criticised the ship, mainly for losing so much in comparison to the KGV for a supposed better AA that became non-existent after a couple HE salvos. Duke of York got a lot of flak for being a clone of KGV, but being objectively worse when it first came out. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |